- LEICA M7 SERIAL NUMBERS YEAR HOW TO
- LEICA M7 SERIAL NUMBERS YEAR MANUAL
- LEICA M7 SERIAL NUMBERS YEAR SERIES
They render with the same famous “Leica look” (or whatever you want to call it) as do the lenses in the brand’s legendary M range.Īll of that mentioned, let’s get to the specifics. Generally speaking they are exceptional, like their M mount counterparts in the rangefinder world.
Lastly, and this may not be obvious, Leica SLRs don’t use the same lenses as their rangefinder cameras.
LEICA M7 SERIAL NUMBERS YEAR SERIES
This is most evident in the changes that occurred when Leica partnered with Minolta between the release of the Leica-developed Leicaflex series and the Minolta-developed R series, and later when that partnership dissolved and Leica developed their final two SLRs. Despite their lack of bells and whistles, many of Leica’s classic SLRs are among my favorite SLRs ever made. Each model iterated on its predecessors in subtle but important ways, and at times these steps were more like leaps. Then again, none of this really matters today. This evidence becomes especially damning when we recall that Minolta then developed and sold (lots and lots of) the first successful autofocus SLR, the Maxxum 7000.
LEICA M7 SERIAL NUMBERS YEAR HOW TO
Was this a blunder or a strategic move? Remember that Leica invented a unique autofocus technology and then promptly sold the patents to Minolta under the auspices that Leica’s customers “know how to focus.” This information noted, shrewd observers might begin to suspect that there was some level of mismanagement happening at one of the most storied brands in the camera industry. That’s downright archaic compared to the industry-dominating Canons and Nikons of the world.
LEICA M7 SERIAL NUMBERS YEAR MANUAL
Even the R9, the final model in the series and a camera that debuted in the year 2002, was a manual focus only camera. What’s the most obvious proof of this theory of specification inferiority that I can point to? How about the fact that no Leica SLR offers autofocus. But this is only true if your definition of better reads as “more stuff for less money.” It’s true that Leica SLRs are generally less-equipped and more expensive cameras compared to their contemporary (and more popular) Japanese SLRs, but like Leica’s rangefinder cameras, it can be argued that Leica SLRs provide everything a photographer truly needs and nothing the photographer does not. Here’s our buyer’s guide for would-be Leica photographers who prefer the single lens reflex way of shooting.įirst, and this is a through line spanning four decades of Leica SLR cameras – Japanese competition was almost always producing objectively “better” cameras. From the original Leicaflex to the cameras co-designed by Minolta and beyond, there’s a Leica SLR for everyone. Though less popular than their rangefinder counterparts, Leica has made quite a number of excellent SLR cameras. But what if you want a Leica that’s not a rangefinder?
It’s a buyer’s guide that has helped at least a few people pick their perfect Leica rangefinder. Last year I wrote a buyer’s guide exploring the many models of Leica rangefinder cameras and explaining which would be best suited to various types of photographer.
0 kommentar(er)
